|Photograph by Andy Field on Flickr|
I really enjoyed the exhibition, not only because I enjoy the art itself. I think it made use of the restricted space very well:
- Firstly, bigger isn't always better: having just a few exhibits helped me feel able to flit between things, to revisit items several times, and to get a feeling for the whole display. In a large exhibition I feel more pressure to go round *in order*, because it's harder to get a grasp of the whole thing.
- Although only a small space is available, every corner of it is used, so a couple of drawings are hung in a small alcove that might ordinarily have been overlooked. This makes the space feel more dynamic, as there's somewhere slightly hidden to walk into, and it makes for a nice surprise when you notice a picture on the wall inside.
- The content was well chosen (I'm sure that the choice must have been overwhelming), so, for example, we get to see a sculpture along with a preliminary sketch and a drawing probably made afterwards. This emphasis on the depth of the collection, and on the artistic process, is (to me at least) more satisfying than and exhibition that just tries to show breadth.
- Books about the artist, the vorticists, and about early 20th British sculptors were available to browse, so visitors could find out more without having to move.
Find out more: