Granted, I've never played to a crowd like this. |
Or maybe, just maybe, I'm an irredeemable show-off.
I wrote the main post for this Thing, and a lot of my thoughts are already condensed into that post. Most of my good advice is over there, but one thing I haven't said before is that a sure-fire way to feel better about presenting is to know your subject matter well. If you're talking about something you've done, then it's hard to be tripped up: you were there, you know what happened, you know what the reasoning was. Maybe that's why I prefer professional presenting to academic presenting...
I've been lucky enough to have the opportunity to speak at quite a few events in the last year. Some of those were conferences and events I'd applied to speak at, and a couple have been invitations from organisers. Being involved in a number of different projects and groups means I've had quite a few things to say!
As for attending conferences, I've enjoyed that a whole lot more since I've started to get to know more people via Twitter and other social media. I wrote about that recently here.
Lastly - organising. Organising events is hard work. That's really all I have to say right now ;)
Interesting: hadn't thought before about the link between musical performance and speaking to a professional audience.
ReplyDeleteI used to play the clarinet; I think the difference is that, in a musical performance, one is so absorbed in communicating through the music, and the emotional and technical detail of one's reading of the piece, that the audience don't intrude; the performer engages with them through the music, and nothing else. It would be only at the end of a piece that I'd remember that they were there, whereas when speaking they are a constant presence.
Tom, that's a good point. Sadly, I don't seem to be much cop at ignoring the audience when playing, certainly not orchestrally. Especially not in last night's concert: woman looking at her watch in the front row, I saw you!
ReplyDelete